Doctoral School - Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

1.

Result of completion of higher education:

a)   completed with a professional title of Master, Master of Engineering, or equivalent;

b)  first degree – for candidates possessing exceptional scientific achievements, as mentioned in § 2 para. 2;

c)   or the weighted average of grades from the course of these studies for candidates, before the planned defense of the master's thesis, and possessing exceptional scientific achievements, as mentioned in § 2 para. 2;

is calculated according to the following scale:

a)       ≥ 4.75 – 15 points

b)       ≥ 4.25 < 4.75 – 10 points

c)       ≥ 4.00 < 4.25 – 5 points

d)       < 4.00 – 0 points

Note: In case of the lack of a result of completing studies on the diploma, the points are determined based on the weighted average obtained from the course grades, which is converted to the scale applied above.

15

1.       Diploma of completion of           higher education or certificate of weighted average from the course of studies.

2.       Diploma supplement.

2.

Documented publishing activity (authorship and/or co-authorship, including papers accepted for publication) covering works from the last 5 years:

1)     Scientific articles published in 2019 and later in scientific journals and peer-reviewed conference materials are evaluated according to the Communication of the Minister of Education and Science dated July 17, 2023, as amended, regarding the list of scientific journals and peer-reviewed conference materials, awarding the following number of points:
a) for 200 points – 25 points
b) for 140 points – 22.5 points
c) for 100 points – 20 points
d) for 70 points – 17.5 points
e) for 40 points – 15 points
f) for 20 points – 10 points
2)     Monographs, chapters in scientific monographs, and scientific monograph editorships are evaluated according to the Communication of the Minister of Education and Science dated July 22, 2021, regarding the list of publishers publishing peer-reviewed scientific monographs, awarding the following number of points:Początek formularza

a)       for a monograph at level II (200   points): 25 points

b)       for a monograph at level I (80 points): 17.5 points

c)       for a chapter in a monograph at level II (200 points): 6.5 points

d)       For a chapter in a monograph at level I (80 points): 4 points

3)     For each work published in journals not listed in the specified list of journals, 3 points are awarded.

Artistic activity, including works from the last 5 years, is assessed based on the Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of July 31, 2020 (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1352, as amended).

4)     An individual author's exhibition presenting visual artworks, organized by a renowned art center or cultural institution, awards 25 points for 200 points.

5)     Authorship of visual artworks or artistic projects, multimedia, sculptural or conservation implementation, a series of visual works or a design collection, disseminated during a significant artistic or scientific event, awards the following number of points for each achievement:

a)   for international achievement worth 200 points: 25 points,

b)  for nationwide achievement worth 100 points: 12.5 points,

c)   for nationwide achievement worth 75 points: 8 points.

6)     for works in the field of design arts, including industrial design, interior architecture, landscape architecture, the following number of points is awarded for each achievement:

a)   for 200 points: 25 points,

b)  for 100 points: 12.5 points,

c)   for 75 points: 10 points.

25

a.   The first page of the article or        chapter of the monograph contains:

-         author(s) surname,

-         title of the article or chapter of the monograph,

-         journal name or monograph title,

-         year of publication,

-         ISBN/ISSN/eISBN/eISSN number, DOI (if assigned).

b.   Certificate from the publisher regarding the acceptance of the article/chapter in the monograph for printing and its copy.

c.   ISBN catalog, website pages: organizer's website, event, certificate from the organizer.

3.

Documented inventive activity, including patents, obtained rights to utility models, exclusive rights of plant breeders to plant varieties, and submissions (authorship and/or co-authorship) from the last 5 years are evaluated as follows:

1)  for obtaining a patent, right to a utility model, exclusive right of a plant breeder to a plant variety granted by the Central Center for Research on Cultivated Plant Varieties or the Community Plant Variety Office: 20 points.

2)  for a patent application, utility model application, or plant breeder's rights application: 5 points.

20       

1.       Decision on granting a patent/protective right, utility model, exclusive plant breeder's right to plant varieties, and submission.

2.       Certificate confirming the filing of a patent, application for protective right, utility model, exclusive plant breeder's right to plant varieties.

4.

Participation* in scientific conferences (from the last 5 years) is assessed as follows:

1)       at an international conference (presentation of a paper/poster): 3 points

2)       at a national (presentation of a paper/poster) - 2 points

3)       at a student or doctoral (presentation of a paper/poster) - 1 point

*Only conference presentations are scored, attendance as a passive listener is not scored

5          

1. Certificate/certificate from the conference organizer.

2. Post-conference materials/program including pages containing:

-         author's surname,

-         title of the presented lecture/paper, communication, or poster,

-         type of conference, name, and date of the conference.

5.

Mobility (from the last 5 years) is assessed as follows:

1)  participation in an international program/internship - 10 points

2)  participation in a domestic program/internship - 5 points

10

1.   Certificate of participation in an international or national program.

2.   Entry in the diploma supplement.

3.   Confirmation of participation in an academic exchange.

4.   Certificate from the employer confirming the candidate's internship.

6.

Social and organizational activity (from the last 5 years) as well as awards and distinctions are assessed as follows:

1)  for each documented form of social or organizational activity, 1 point is awarded.

2)  social and organizational activity includes:

a)   activity for at least 1 year in a student or doctoral scientific circle or scientific society,

b)  activity for at least 1 year in a student, doctoral, or university organization,

c)   membership in organizational committees of scientific conferences/symposia, debates, exhibitions/competitions, artistic plein-airs, active participation in promoting the faculty/university.

3)  for each documented award/distinction, the following points are awarded:

a)   5 points for international awards,

b)  3 points for national awards,

c)   2 points for international distinctions,

d)  1 point for national distinctions.

1.        

1.   Confirmation of membership signed by the supervisor or president of the scientific circle, president of the scientific society, containing information about the candidate's membership duration and roles held.

2.   Certificate issued by the organizer of the conference/debate/outdoor event/exhibition.

3.   Conference materials (pages confirming participation).

4.   Confirmation of participation in promoting the faculty/university.

5.   Confirmation of membership in student or doctoral organizations, containing information about the candidate's membership duration and roles held.

6.   Entry in the diploma supplement.

7.   Decision/diploma regarding the award/distinction or any other document confirming being among the awarded individuals and information about the scope of the competition (e.g., certificate from the organizer or announcement of the competition).

7.

Participation in project implementation (from the last 5 years) is assessed as follows:

1)  scientific-research projects:

a)   project leader in international projects - 10 points,

b)  executor in international projects - 5 points,

c)   project leader in national projects - 7 points,

d)  executor/volunteer in national projects - 3 points

or

2)  IT projects:

a)   Main executor - 10 points,

b)  Executor - 5 points,

or

3)  architectural/construction projects:

a)   main author of the project - 10 points

b)   co-author of the project - 5 points

4)  artistic projects:

a)       presentation of artistic works (e.g., exhibition) in an artistic institution or institution with established artistic prestige - individual - 10 points

b)       presentation of artistic works (e.g., exhibition) in an artistic institution or institution with established artistic prestige - group - 5 points

10       

1.   Decision on project approval.

2.   Certificate/contract confirming participation in the project.

3.   Project documentation (especially pages containing information about the role the candidate played in its preparation).

4.   Certificate from the organizer/curator of the exhibition or catalog/poster/invitation containing information about the organizing entity, date, venue, and nature of the achievement (individual/group exhibition) as well as the work(s) presented.

8.

Research Project Outline The research project should be described in a maximum of 5 pages of standardized manuscript and include the following elements:

1)  Definition of the research problem, research objectives, theses, and research hypotheses (max. 10 points),

2)  Innovation and originality of the research project (max. 10 points),

3)  Current state of research worldwide (max. 10 points),

4)  Research method/methods used to solve the research problem (max. 10 points).

40

Manuscript of a research outline prepared in accordance with the description provided in section 2.

Total points

130

1.

Evaluation of the research/artistic project, taking into account its substantive value

15

2.

Assessment of the candidate's knowledge of the latest research trends in the area consistent with the subject matter of the research/artistic project

15

3.

Evaluation of the candidate's skills in presenting the research/artistic project

20

The sum of points

50

1.

The result of completing higher education studies, culminating in a master's degree, master of engineering degree, or equivalent, is converted according to the following scale:

a)   ≥ 4.75 – 15 points

b)  ≥ 4.25 < 4.75 – 10 points

c)   ≥ 4.00 < 4.25 – 5 points

d)  < 4.00 – 0 points.

Note: In case of the absence of a result of completing studies on the diploma, the points are determined based on the weighted average obtained from the grades during the course of education, which is then converted into the scale mentioned above.

15       

1.   Diploma confirming completion of higher education studies or a certificate of weighted average from the course of studies.

2.   Diploma supplement.

2.

Documented publishing activity (authorship and/or co-authorship, including works accepted for publication) covering works from the last 5 years:

1)  Scientific articles published in 2019 and later years in scientific journals and peer-reviewed materials from international conferences are evaluated in accordance with the Minister of Education and Science Communication of 17 July 2023, as amended, regarding the list of scientific journals and peer-reviewed materials from international conferences, awarding the following number of points:

a)   for 200 points – 25 points

b)  for 140 points – 22.5 points

c)   for 100 points – 20 points

d)  for 70 points – 17.5 points

e)   for 40 points – 15 points

f)   for 20 points – 10 points

2)  Monographs, chapters in scientific monographs, and scientific monograph editing are evaluated in accordance with the Minister of Education and Science Communication of 22 July 2021 regarding the list of publishers publishing peer-reviewed scientific monographs, awarding the following number of points:

a)   for a monograph at level II (200 points) – 25 points

b)  for a monograph at level I (80 points) – 17.5 points

c)   for a chapter in a monograph at level II (200 points) – 6.5 points

d)  for a chapter in a monograph at level I (80 points) – 4 points

3)  For each work published in journals not included in the specified list of journals, 3 points are awarded.

Documented publishing activity (authorship and/or co-authorship, including works accepted for publication) covering works from the last 5 years:

Artistic activity covering works from the last 5 years is evaluated based on the Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 31 July 2020 (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1352, as amended).

4)  An individual authorial exhibition presenting artistic works, organized by a renowned artistic center or renowned cultural institution, awards 25 points for 200 points.

5)  Authorship of a plastic work or artistic project, multimedia, sculptural, or conservation implementation, a series of artistic works or a design collection, disseminated during a significant artistic or scientific event, awards the following number of points for each achievement:

a)   For international achievement worth 200 points – 25 points,

b)  For national achievement worth 100 points – 12.5 points,

c)   For national achievement worth 75 points – 8 points.

6)  Work in the field of design arts, including industrial design, interior architecture, landscape architecture, awards the following number of points for each achievement:

a)   For 200 points – 25 points

b)  For 100 points – 12.5 points

c)   For 75 points – 10 points

25

1.       25kt

1.   The first page of the article or chapter of the monograph containing:

-         author(s) surname,

-         article or chapter title,

-         Journal name or monograph title,

-         Year of publication,

-         ISBN/ISSN/eISBN/eISSN number, DOI (if assigned).

2.   Certificate from the publisher regarding the acceptance of the article/chapter in the monograph for printing, and their copy.

3.   ISBN catalog, pages: organizer's website, event, certificate from the organizer.

3.

Documented inventive activity, including: patents, obtained protection rights for utility models and exclusive rights of breeders to plant varieties and applications (authorship and/or co-authorship from the last 5 years are assessed as follows:

1)  for a patent, utility model protection right, exclusive breeder's right to a plant variety granted by the Central Center for Research on Cultivated Plant Varieties or the Community Plant Variety Office - 20 points

2)            for a patent application, utility model application or application for a breeder's right to a plant variety - 5 points

20       

1.     Decision to grant a patent/protective right, utility model, breeder's exclusive right to plant varieties and application.

2.     A certificate confirming the submission of a patent, an application
for a protection right, a utility model, or the breeder's exclusive right to plant varieties.

4.

Participation in scientific conferences (in the last 5 years) is assessed as follows:

1)  * in international language (presentation of a paper/poster) – 3 points

2)  * in the national competition (presentation of a paper/poster) – 2 points

*Only conference presentations are scored, participation as a free listener is not scored

5          

1.   Certificate from the conference organizer/certificate;

2.   Post-conference materials/conference program containing pages that read:

-      author's name,

-      title of the presented lecture/paper, announcement or poster,

-      type of conference, name
and date of the conference.

5.

Mobility (over the last 5 years) is assessed as follows:

1) participation in an international program/internship – 10 points

2) participation in a national program/internship 5 points

10

1.   Certificate of participation in an international or national program.

2.   Entry in the diploma supplement.

3.   Confirmation of participation in an academic exchange.

4.   A certificate from the employer confirming that the candidate has completed an internship.

6.

Participation in project implementation (over the last 5 years) is assessed as follows:

1)  scientific and research:

a)   international project manager – 10 points

b)  contractor in an international project – 7 points

c)   national project manager – 7 points

d)  contractor/volunteer in a national project – 3 points

or

2)  IT:

a)   main contractor – 10 points

b)  contractor – 5 points

or

3)  architectural / construction:

a)   main author of the project – 10 points

b)  co-author of the project – 5 points

4)  artistic:

a)   presentation of artistic works (e.g. exhibition) in an artistic institution or a facility with established artistic prestige - individual - 10 points

b)  presentation of artistic works (e.g. exhibition) in an artistic institution or a facility with established artistic prestige - team - 5 points

10       

1.   Decision to award the project.

2.   Certificate/agreement confirming participation in the project.

3.   Project documentation (in particular pages containing information about the role played by the candidate in its preparation).

4.   A certificate from the organizer/curator of the exhibition or a catalogue/poster/invitation containing information about the organizing entity, date, place and nature of the achievement (individual/group exhibition) and the presented work(s).

7.

Results of research and development activities and cooperation with the socio-economic environment:

1)  For each research and development activity or cooperation with the socio-economic environment – 5 points

2)  The following number of points is awarded for each documented award/recognition:

a)   5 points for international awards,

b)  3 points for national awards,

c)   2 points for international distinctions,

d)  1 point for national distinctions.

30       

1.   Documents confirming research and development activities or cooperation with the socio-economic environment.

2.   Decision/diploma awarding a prize/distinction or other document confirming being among the winners and information about the scope of the competition (e.g. an organizer's certificate or a competition announcement).

8.

The outline of the research project should be described on a maximum of 5 pages of a standard typescript and include the following elements:

1)  defining the research problem, research goal, theses and research hypotheses (max. 10 points)

2)  novelty and originality of the research project, importance for the entrepreneur (max. 10 points)

3)  current state of research in the world (max. 10 points)

4)  research method/methods used to solve the research problem (max. 10 points)

40

Typescript of the research outline prepared in accordance with the description in box 2.

Total points

155

1.

Assessment of the research/artistic project, taking into account the substantive value and the importance of the results of the planned scientific activity for the development of innovation and the economy

15

2.

Assessment of the candidate's knowledge of the latest research trends in the area consistent with the subject of the research/artistic project

15

3.

Assessment of skills in presenting a research/artistic project

20

Total points

50

engineering and technology

architecture and urban planning

automation, electronics, electrical engineering and space technologies

information and communication technology

chemical engineering

civil engineering, geodesy and transport

materials engineering

mechanical engineering

environmental engineering, mining and energy

agricultural sciences

agriculture and horticulture

nutrition and food technology

animal science and fisheries

natural sciences

chemical sciences

social

economics and finance

the arts

fine arts and art conservation

registration of the candidate in the Internet Recruitment of Candidates (IRK)

June 28th - July 11th, 2024

submitting documents at the office of the Doctoral School at ZUT

July 1st - 12th, 2024

announcement of the results of stage I of the qualification procedure

August 19th, 2024

submitting requests for reconsideration of the case

until August 26th, 2024

dates for interviews - stage II of the recruitment procedure:

architecture and urban planning

fine arts and art conservation

automation, electronics, electricial engineering and space technologies

information and communication technology

chemical engineering

chemical sciences

civil engineering, geodesy and transport

materials engineering

mechanical engineering

environmental engineering, mining and energy

agriculture and horticulture

food and nutrition technology

annimal science and fisheries

economics and finance

announcement of the list of candidates admitted to the Doctoral School at ZUT

announcement of the list of candidates admitted to the Doctoral School at ZUT - funded by the "Doctoral implementary" programme

No.

Fields

Discyplines of science and of the arts

Planned admission limits for candidates to the Doctoral School at ZUT(financing from faculty subsidies)

1.

Architecture and urban planning

engineering and technology

2

WA

2.

automation, electronics, electrical engineering and space technologies

5

WE

3.

Information and communication technology

7

WI

4.

Chemical engineering

2

WTiICh

5.

Civil engineering, geodesy and transport

2

WBiIŚ

6.

Materials engineering

2

WTiICh

1

WIMiM

7.

Mechanical engineering

2

8.

Envionmental engineering, mining and energy

1

WBiIŚ

1

WKŚiR

9.

Agriculture and horticulture

agricultural sciences

1

10.

Food and nutrition technology

1

WNoŻiR

11.

Animals science and fisheries

1

4

WBiHZ

12.

Chemical science

natural sciences

1

WTiICh

13.

Economics and finance

social

1

WEkon

14.

Fine arts and art conservation

the arts

1

WA

Total

35

architecture and urban planning

hab. inż. arch. Magdalena Czałczyńska-Podolska, prof. ZUT

dr hab. inż. arch. Klara Czyńska, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  231 kB)

dr hab. inż. arch. Grzegorz Wojtkun, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  147 kB)

dr hab. inż. arch. Adam Zwoliński, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  153 kB)

automation, electronics, electrical engineering and space technologies

prof. dr hab. inż. Tomasz Chady (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  169 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Konstanty Gawrylczyk (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  205 kB)

dr hab. inż. Paweł Dworak, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  165 kB)

dr hab. inż. Przemysław Łopato, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  285 kB)

dr hab. inż. Przemysław Mazurek, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  159 kB)

dr hab. inż. Witold Mickiewicz, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  163 kB)

dr hab. inż. Grzegorz Psuj prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  239 kB)

dr hab. inż. Marcin Wardach, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  165 kB)

information and communication technology

prof. dr hab. inż. Aleksandr Cariow (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  152 kB)

dr hab. inż. Paweł Forczmański, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  157 kB)

dr hab. inż. Dariusz Frejlichowski, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  162 kB)

dr hab. inż. Tomasz Hyla, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  197 kB)

dr hab. inż. Przemysław Klęsk, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  182 kB)

dr hab. inż. Przemysław Korytkowski, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  145 kB)

dr hab. inż. Marcin Korzeń, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  145 kB)

dr hab. inż. Krzysztof Małecki, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  160 kB)

dr hab inż Przemysław Mazurek, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  159 kB)

dr hab. inż. Marcin Pluciński, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  167 kB)

dr hab. inż. Przemysław Różewski, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  162 kB)

chemical engineering

prof. dr hab. inż. Zbigniew Czech (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  158 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Elżbieta Filipek (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  172 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Marek Gryta (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  170 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Antoni W. Morawski (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  242 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Sylwia Mozia (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  151 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Jacek Przepiórski (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  144 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Agnieszka Wróblewska (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  159 kB)

dr hab. inż. Anna Błońska-Tabero, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  147 kB)

dr hab. inż. Monika Bosacka, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  149 kB)

dr hab. inż. Agnieszka Kowalczyk, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  209 kB)

dr hab. inż. Zofia Lendzion-Bieluń, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  239 kB)

dr hab. inż. Elżbieta Tomaszewicz, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  205 kB)

dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Wilpiszewska, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  176 kB)

dr hab. inż. Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  183 kB)

dr hab. inż. Iwona Pełech (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  149 kB)

dr hab. inż. Beata Schmidt (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  200 kB)

civil engineering, geodesy and transport

prof. dr hab. inż. Elżbieta Horszczaruk (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  182 kB)

dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Zwarycz-Makles (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  166 kB)

materials engineering

prof. dr hab. inż. Mirosława El Fray (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  214 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Elżbieta Filipek (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  172 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Elżbieta Horoszczaruk (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  182 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Jacek Przepiórski (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  144 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Ewa Mijowska (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  178 kB)

prof. dr hab. inż. Antoni Morawski (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  242 kB)

dr hab. inż. Anna Błońska-Tabero, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  147 kB)

dr hab. inż. Monika Bosacka, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  149 kB)

dr hab. inż. Grażyna Dąbrowska, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  202 kB)

dr hab. inż. Elżbieta Tomaszewicz, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  205 kB)

dr hab. inż. Krzysztof Kowalczyk, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  121 kB)

dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Wilpiszewska, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  176 kB)

dr hab. inż. Beata Zielińska (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  184 kB)

dr hab. inż. Beata Schmidt (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  200 kB)

mechanical engineering

dr hab. inż. Paweł Gutowski, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  219 kB)

dr hab. inż. Kamil Urbanowicz, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  170 kB)

dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Zwarycz-Makles (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  166 kB)

environmental engineering, mining and energy

prof. dr hab. inż. Antoni Morawski (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  242 kB)

dr hab. inż. Katarzyna Zwarycz-Makles (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  166 kB)

agriculture and horticulture

dr hab. inż. Marek Bury, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  193 kB)

food and nutrition technology

dr hab. inż. Iwona Adamska, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  143 kB)

dr hab. inż. Artur Ciemniak, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  145 kB)

dr hab. inż. Agata Witczak, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  182 kB)

animal science and fisheries

dr hab. inż. Wioletta Biel, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  163 kB)

dr hab. inż. Artur Ciemniak, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  145 kB)

dr hab. inż. Jolanta Kiełpińska, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  202 kB)

dr hab. inż. Arkadiusz Nędzarek, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  204 kB)

dr hab. inż. Remigiusz Panicz, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  205 kB)

dr hab. inż. Adam Tański, prof. ZUT (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  197 kB)

prof dr hab Małgorzata Ożgo (format:  pdf, rozmiar:  179 kB)